🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to enact a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," commented one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are secure and fit for young users," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the state government level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating adult authorization for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.